🔥💸 Google's $2.4B "Acqui-Hire" Left Windsurf Employees With Nothing

In partnership with

Finally, a powerful CRM—made simple.

Attio is the AI-native CRM built to scale your company from seed stage to category leader. Powerful, flexible, and intuitive to use, Attio is the CRM for the next-generation of teams.

Sync your email and calendar, and Attio instantly builds your CRM—enriching every company, contact, and interaction with actionable insights in seconds.

With Attio, AI isn’t just a feature—it’s the foundation.

• Instantly find and route leads with research agents

• Get real-time AI insights during customer conversations

• Build AI automations for your most complex workflows

• Join fast growing teams like Flatfile, Replicate, Modal, and more.

Start for free today.

Thank you for supporting my ads. These help me in delivering high-quality analysis for free, forever.

Last Friday, Google announced it was hiring away Windsurf's CEO Varun Mohan, co-founder Douglas Chen, and key R&D employees for $2.4 billion. Not acquiring the company, just the people. The 250-person AI coding startup was left behind like an empty shell, with $100 million in the bank and a whole lot of confused employees wondering what the hell just happened.

By Monday, those remaining employees had been acquired by Cognition, the startup behind the AI coding agent Devin. The whiplash was extraordinary: in the span of 72 hours, Windsurf went from a $3 billion OpenAI acquisition target to a Google talent extraction to a Cognition rescue mission.

This looks like another crazy AI deal, but it's actually something more systematic. Antitrust enforcement has created a new playbook that destroys the startup social contract while pretending to protect competition.

The New M&A Playbook: Talent Extraction

The Windsurf deal follows an increasingly familiar pattern. When Google wanted Character AI's capabilities, it didn't buy the company, it hired the founders and key employees for $2.7 billion. When Microsoft wanted Inflection AI's talent, same playbook: hire the founders and most of the team, leave the company behind.

What happens is that Big Tech companies get the capabilities they want while avoiding the regulatory scrutiny that comes with traditional acquisitions. Google doesn't "own" Windsurf, so there's no antitrust review. They just happen to have hired most of the people who built it, along with a non-exclusive license to the technology.

It's regulatory arbitrage at its finest and it's creating outcomes that are far worse for competition and innovation than old-fashioned acquisitions ever were.

The Social Contract Breakdown

To understand why this matters, you need to understand what startup employees actually signed up for. When someone joins a startup, they're making a specific bet: lower salary, longer hours, and higher risk in exchange for equity upside. The implicit promise is simple: we're going to win or lose together.

The Windsurf deal obliterated that promise. Here's how the $2.4 billion was distributed:

• Founders: $720 million to $1.1 billion (plus new Google retention grants)

• VCs: $700-900 million across seed through Series C

• Vested employees: Maybe $50-80 million total, heavily weighted toward early hires

• Unvested employees: Nothing

The math is brutal. Windsurf had roughly 25 million shares in its employee option pool, but only 5-8 million had vested. That means employees who joined in the last year, the people who'd been working 80-hour weeks to build the product Google wanted, got precisely zero dollars from the deal.

Yeah, unvested stock didn't get paid out, so what? They're adhering to the contracts. But there's a difference between following the letter of an agreement and honoring the spirit of what people signed up for.

The Regulatory Irony

The truly perverse part is that this outcome is a direct result of antitrust enforcement that was supposed to protect competition. Lina Khan's FTC made traditional tech acquisitions so difficult that companies had to find workarounds. The workarounds are systematically worse for everyone except the acquirers.

Think about what would have happened if Google had simply bought Windsurf outright for $2.4 billion. The entire team would have been acquired, employees would have gotten retention grants, and the company would have continued operating as a Google subsidiary. Instead, we got a talent extraction that left most employees behind and a shell company that immediately sold itself to a competitor.

I'm not saying traditional acquisitions are perfect, they're not. But they at least preserve teams, provide clear exits for employees, and create genuine liquidity events. The current approach gives us the worst of both worlds: concentrated power for Big Tech and screwed-over employees.

The AI Talent Arms Race

What makes this particularly acute is the desperate competition for AI talent. Meta is reportedly paying hundreds of millions for individual AI researchers from firms like OpenAI along with key figures like Daniel Gross, Nat Friedman & former Apple engineer Ruoming Pang.

The market for elite AI talent has become so overheated that companies are willing to pay acquisition-level prices for individual people.

This isn't just about money, it's about time. AI capabilities are advancing so rapidly that being six months behind might mean being irrelevant. So Big Tech CEOs are making a calculated bet: pay whatever it takes to get the best people, deal with regulatory scrutiny later.

The problem is that "later" never comes. These deals are structured specifically to avoid antitrust review, which means there's no mechanism to ensure they're actually good for competition or innovation.

The Windsurf Rescue Mission

The fact that Cognition swooped in to acquire the remaining Windsurf team at least gave them a way out. Cognition didn't just buy the company, they explicitly structured the deal so that "100% of Windsurf employees will participate financially" and "have all vesting cliffs waived."

This was smart business by Cognition. They get a talented team, hundreds of thousands of customers (Windsurf is at $82M ARR) and proven technology, while Windsurf employees finally get the equity participation they were promised.

But here's the thing: Cognition shouldn't have needed to be the good guy. If Google had simply acquired Windsurf in a traditional deal, none of this would have been necessary.

What This Means

Maybe the lesson here is that antitrust enforcement works best when it's predictable and targeted, not when it's broad and punitive. Deals should be blocked when they're genuinely anti-competitive and harmful to consumers, not as a blanket policy against Big Tech growth.

Because right now, the main beneficiaries of strict antitrust enforcement seem to be Big Tech companies themselves. They get the capabilities they want while avoiding the accountability that comes with ownership. Meanwhile, startup employees get to learn a hard lesson about the difference between legal compliance and actual fairness.

The Windsurf saga is over, but I’m expecting to see more of these deals in the next 12 months.