Rippling Sue Deel for Corporate Espionage

Cut Through Noise with The Flyover!

The Flyover offers a refreshing alternative to traditional news. Our talented editors meticulously curate the day's top stories, keeping you informed and ready to win your day. Join over 950,000 readers who trust The Flyover's unbiased insights!

Subscribe with One Click!

In a dramatic escalation of competition in the HR software market, Rippling has filed a lawsuit against rival Deel, alleging corporate espionage. The suit, filed in San Francisco federal court, claims Deel planted a spy within Rippling to steal company secrets and competitive intelligence.

The Espionage Allegations

According to the lawsuit, Rippling discovered an employee in its Ireland office who was allegedly accessing sensitive information unrelated to his payroll operations role. The lawsuit claims this employee searched for the term "Deel" more than a dozen times daily and accessed sales-related Slack channels over 450 times.

Most damaging, the lawsuit alleges the employee downloaded a 31-slide presentation detailing Rippling's competitive strategy against Deel and accessed information about customers considering switching from Deel to Rippling.

Rippling's legal team set up what they describe as a "honeypot" operation to confirm their suspicions. They created a fake Slack channel named "#d-defectors" and sent a legal letter to Deel's leadership mentioning this channel. Within hours, the suspected employee allegedly searched for and accessed the non-existent channel, which Rippling characterizes as a "smoking gun" implicating Deel's leadership.

When confronted with a court order to surrender his phone, the employee allegedly claimed it was in a bag on another floor. When this proved false, the lawsuit states he locked himself in a bathroom despite warnings from a court-appointed solicitor that this violated the court order, reportedly saying, "I'm willing to take that risk." The employee then allegedly fled the premises.

A Deel representative has denied "all legal wrongdoing" and claimed Rippling is attempting to distract from allegations that it violated sanctions laws, which Rippling denies.

Competing Business Models Drive Market Tension

This lawsuit highlights the intensifying competition between two companies that started with different value propositions but are now converging.

Founded in 2016 by Parker Conrad, Rippling built an integrated HR and IT platform focused primarily on the U.S. market. The company positioned itself as a "compound startup," creating an all-in-one system that integrates employee data across HR, IT, and finance functions.

In contrast, Deel entered the market in 2019 as an "employer of record" service, helping U.S. companies hire globally while navigating international compliance regulations. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly accelerated Deel's growth as remote work became mainstream, while by some accounts catching Rippling off guard.

Despite their different starting points, both companies have achieved similar valuations of approximately $13 billion. However, their financial profiles differ significantly. Rippling reported $350 million in ARR for 2023 with a total of $1.2 billion raised, while Deel reached $800 million ARR in 2024 having raised only $680 million.

Divergent Business Models

The revenue disparity despite similar valuations reflects fundamental differences in business models. Rippling operates as a traditional SaaS company with a per-seat pricing model. Its "compound startup" approach allows it to acquire customers with a few point solutions and then cross-sell additional products, achieving a customer acquisition cost payback period of 17 months (compared to the SaaS industry average of 28 months).

Deel, meanwhile, functions more as a managed services company, providing legal support and guidance for international expansion. This high-touch approach commands premium pricing compared to Rippling's software-centric model, but means they likely operate a lower margins.

This also represents a fascinating broader trend where startups within AI are targeting service-based enterprise spending rather than traditional software budgets, to capture a greater portion of spend from each client.

Strategic Convergence Inevitable

Industry analysts note that strategic convergence between these companies was inevitable given market evolution. With approximately 70% of public companies based in the U.S., Deel needed to develop domestic HRIS and payroll capabilities to remain competitive and continue its growth trajectory. Similarly, Rippling needed to expand internationally as remote work became standard practice.

However, full convergence remains unlikely. Replicating Deel's regulatory expertise across 150+ countries and adopting a more human led service model seems incredibly hard for Rippling, and Deel would find it challenging to match Rippling's integrated software suite.

Whilst they both likely pitch the promise of consolidation and a winner takes all market to investors hungry for growth these dynamics, and the fact most B2B SaaS markets are not winner takes all, and instead are oligopolies this suggests both companies might continue to operate in parallel within client organizations, each serving distinct needs.

Reputation Impact May Exceed Legal Consequences

Despite the fact this Deel will likely continue to have a very real need within enterprises the reputational damage to the company will likely exceed any immediate business impact from the alleged espionage.

Whilst this corporate spy may have helped Deel recover $1 million in lost revenue to Rippling the legal fees alone is likely to cost millions and will more than likely cost Deel tens of millions in revenue over the coming years as compliance teams evaluating HR solutions factor these allegations into their vendor selection process.

It’s unclear who will benefit the most from this, Deel certainly won’t go bankrupt from this and will continue to grow but the teams squeamish about Deel will have to go somewhere else - maybe enterprise players like ADP or even Rippling itself get a nice little boost as customers seek alternatives?